Thank you! Your data is ready.
Your download should start automatically. If not, click here:
You’ve just taken a big step toward automating your PCF mapping.
Curious how this works on your actual portfolio?
You’ve probably faced these challenges before.
Naming conventions
- Chemicals often have multiple synonyms
- May not align with internal naming systems
Data availability
- Over 23,000 substances registered under REACH
- Many are not yet included in existing LCA databases
How your team tries to solve it — and why it breaks down
Manual spreadsheet mapping
✕ Worst time of your life
✕ Prone to error
Name-based generic mapping tools
✕ Problems due to missing (use of) naming conventions
✕ Varying quality
Hire a sustainability consultancy
✕ Creates external dependencies
✕ Potentially high cost
✕ Varying quality
We have the Winning formula
How to get your own Emission Factor Mapping report
1
Getting an NDA signed (if needed).
2
Filling out our CAS matching template and sending it to us.
3
We run our automated CAS matching, as well as proxy and chemical name-based match.
4
Presenting the results and internal review.